Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by law." It's effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the regulation laid down from the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority on the parent department in the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits for the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

4.       Record shows that the petitioner has been booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Although the petitioner has obtained bail in People cases, it does, prima facie, build that the petitioner is liable to repeating the offence.

Though there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds tiny sway. Still, if there is not any precedent in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may be considered through the court.

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. Should the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then technique the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 times with the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.

In this site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Checking out its provisions as well as the gravity of its punishment.

                                                                  

The issue here is that an accused may say that they meant to injure the victim, but they didn't intend to get rid of them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted due to the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.

Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic towards the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.

VI)     The petitioner is at the rear of the bars considering that arrest, investigation of the case is complete, he is not any more required to the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him behind the bars before summary of trial will provide no practical purpose.

Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration because of the Court under Article 184 (three), continues to be setting a precedent which allows for much easier access towards the public to strategy the superior courts and the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

ten. Without touching the merits of your case of your issue of yearly increases in the pensionary emoluments of the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, such yearly increase, if permissible from the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment to become made through the court of plenary case definition law jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to the healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it truly is important that the case recognized the application of your precautionary principle where there is often a danger to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations of the State in protecting the right to the clean and healthy environment.

dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded to the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )